Big Media continues to ignore election-flipping evidence of fraud being presented in front of state legislatures across the US

It doesn’t matter how much evidence of election fraud is presented before the state legislatures, the Democrats, the mainstream media and the Big Tech propaganda machine won’t accept reality. Dead set on removing Trump by any means possible, these entities won’t accept the undeniable truth that their puppet “president-elect” failed to garner enough votes, that it took despicable levels of fraud and coercion to steal the election. The very integrity and foundation of the American republic is at stake, and yet too many journalists and influencers continue to smear the fact that there is enough evidence of election fraud to flip the election back to Trump.

One improbable Biden vote injection stole the Pennsylvania Presidential election

The most egregious example of vote manipulation was presented during hearings in Gettysburg, Pennsylvania on November 25th. An expert, testifying before the Pennsylvania Senate, flagged a large batch of ballots that were a statistical anomaly. This mother-of-all Biden vote hauls recorded approximately 570,000 votes for Joe Biden and only 3,200 for Trump. That’s right: Biden pulled in an impossible 99.4 percent of the votes in that batch, a statistical improbability. This fraudulent vote haul would have been enough to overturn the election.

The evidence was brought forth thanks to Retired Colonel Phil Waldron, who has a background in electronic warfare. Colonel Waldron testified in Gettysburg before the Senate majority Policy Committee, Senator David Argall and Doug Mastriano. Mastriano ruled that the impossible vote haul for Biden was “unacceptable” while calling for the resignation of Pennsylvania Secretary of State Kathy Boockvar, who was supposed to oversee the election. (Boockvar has repeatedly called for Trump to be remove from office. She is not an unbiased arbiter.)

At the hearing, Rudy Giuliani asked Colonel Waldron to clarify what his analytics team means when they talk about “spike anomalies” in voting patterns. Waldron explained that these are “events where a numerical amount of votes are processed in a time period that is not feasible or mechanically possible under normal circumstances.” Waldron released evidence in the form of a chart that showed an unbelievable injection of Biden votes into the system.

If the improbable injection of votes would have been for Trump, then the media would be on top of it, questioning President Trump, investigating the lead. This bombshell evidence of fraud has largely fallen on deaf ears, as half of the country moves forward believing that the election was the most secure in the history of the country. Unexplained vote spikes for Biden have also been reported in Michigan, Georgia and Wisconsin, with virtually no reporting across Big Media and Big Tech.

The bombshell exchange Big Media and Big Tech are trying to hide

Waldron said: At the very beginning of the chart, where there’s a circle that says, “On Election Day,” what that indicates is there’s a spike in loaded votes. 337,000-plus-or-minus-some votes that were added in there in one big batch. So that was an anomaly in the reporting. Normally you would expect to see a smooth curve going up, not any big spikes, that’s kind of what Greg was talking about, the anomalies of loading and uploading those votes. So that big spike that occurs there is a prime indicator of fraudulent voting.

Giuliani: And that’s [a total of] 604,000 votes in 90 minutes, is that right?

Waldron: Correct, this is [shows chart] 337,000 votes in that period of time.

Giuliani: And when you look at this entire curve, with all these spikes, can you calculate how much of a vote that accounted for Biden, and how much for Trump?

Waldron: Close to 600,000. I think our figures were about 570-some-odd-thousand that all those spikes represent over time.

Giuliani: For Biden?

Waldron: Correct.

Giuliani: And how much for Trump?

Waldron: I think it was a little over 3,200.

Watch the crowd gasp after hearing the exchange. (Exchange begins at 1:28:00.)

Sources include:

Spectator.org

NaturalNews.com

Brighteon.com